Comments for Karl's Little World http://karl.dyson.uk.net ...and the things that make it tick... Thu, 05 May 2011 20:24:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on IPv6 Privacy Extensions by Karl http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2011/04/ipv6-privacy-extensions/comment-page-1#comment-37 Karl Thu, 05 May 2011 20:24:21 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=292#comment-37 Hmm. So, there are bugs in the kernel that mean that setting .../all/... don't propogate to individual interfaces..... https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11655 Hmm. So, there are bugs in the kernel that mean that setting …/all/… don’t propogate to individual interfaces…..

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11655

]]> Comment on A Vigor 120, Linux box and IPv6 by PhilT http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2010/04/a-vigor-120-linux-box-and-ipv6/comment-page-1#comment-33 PhilT Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:46:19 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=162#comment-33 OK. Need to lie down in a dark room and think about it. OK. Need to lie down in a dark room and think about it.

]]> Comment on A Vigor 120, Linux box and IPv6 by Karl http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2010/04/a-vigor-120-linux-box-and-ipv6/comment-page-1#comment-32 Karl Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:52:32 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=162#comment-32 I don't have a global scope IPv6 on ppp0 either; I only have the global scope IPv6 on eth1 I don’t have a global scope IPv6 on ppp0 either; I only have the global scope IPv6 on eth1

]]> Comment on A Vigor 120, Linux box and IPv6 by PhilT http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2010/04/a-vigor-120-linux-box-and-ipv6/comment-page-1#comment-31 PhilT Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:47:26 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=162#comment-31 Thanks, I have link address on eth0 too. But I don't have IPv6 Global address on ppp0, I was trying to figure out how to assing it, as PPP didn't............... phil@minuet:/etc/network$ ifconfig ppp0 ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol inet addr:78.33.xxx.yyy P-t-P:188.39.1.10 Mask:255.255.255.255 inet6 addr: fe80::75b1:9167:310b:cb3c/10 Scope:Link UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1492 Metric:1 RX packets:14260 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:14492 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:3 RX bytes:6699060 (6.6 MB) TX bytes:2358018 (2.3 MB) Thanks,

I have link address on eth0 too. But I don’t have IPv6 Global address on ppp0, I was trying to figure out how to assing it, as PPP didn’t……………

phil@minuet:/etc/network$ ifconfig ppp0
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:78.33.xxx.yyy P-t-P:188.39.1.10 Mask:255.255.255.255
inet6 addr: fe80::75b1:9167:310b:cb3c/10 Scope:Link
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1492 Metric:1
RX packets:14260 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:14492 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
RX bytes:6699060 (6.6 MB) TX bytes:2358018 (2.3 MB)

]]> Comment on A Vigor 120, Linux box and IPv6 by Karl http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2010/04/a-vigor-120-linux-box-and-ipv6/comment-page-1#comment-30 Karl Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:24:18 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=162#comment-30 The only IPv6 address on eth0 is the link local address; I don't assign one. It's similar to the way you would/could do un-numbered interfaces on, say, a Cisco router. The only IPv6 address on eth0 is the link local address; I don’t assign one. It’s similar to the way you would/could do un-numbered interfaces on, say, a Cisco router.

]]> Comment on A Vigor 120, Linux box and IPv6 by PhilT http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2010/04/a-vigor-120-linux-box-and-ipv6/comment-page-1#comment-29 PhilT Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:16:45 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=162#comment-29 interesting, thanks for posting this. Do A&A supply an IPv6 address via the PPP negotiation ? I didn't see where you were assigning an IP to eth0. interesting, thanks for posting this.

Do A&A supply an IPv6 address via the PPP negotiation ? I didn’t see where you were assigning an IP to eth0.

]]> Comment on tcp/53 isn’t just for AXFR by Karl http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2010/03/tcp53-isnt-just-for-axfr/comment-page-1#comment-3 Karl Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:46:30 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=97#comment-3 Update: It's worth noting, that as DNSSEC is adopted, some related DNS responses can be in the order of 2k. If you're not allowing tcp/53, you *really* should! Update: It’s worth noting, that as DNSSEC is adopted, some related DNS responses can be in the order of 2k.

If you’re not allowing tcp/53, you *really* should!

]]> Comment on F5 BigIP by Lee http://karl.dyson.uk.net/2009/06/f5-bigip/comment-page-1#comment-2 Lee Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:39:17 +0000 http://karl.dyson.uk.net/?p=45#comment-2 Cracking bits of kit, should certainly keep us all busy for a bit longer... Cracking bits of kit, should certainly keep us all busy for a bit longer…

]]>